Blog

Accountants, Accounting Education, AICPA, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), GRI Certified Training, Integrated Reporting, ISOS Group, Sustainability, Sustainability education, Sustainability Reporting

Will Accountants Save the World?

 

earth_and_limb_m1199291564l_color_2stretch_mask_0

NASA/Goddard/Arizona State University

As an accountant, I was thrilled to read that Peter Bakker, President of World Business Council for Sustainable Development , said, “Accountants would save the world.” This should make any accountant smile. The realist in me knows that it will take a big “village” to save the world, but accountants can play an important role.

At an experts panel discussion in Amsterdam, Marjolein Baghuis stated, “… the conclusion was that accountants can certainly play a role in making companies more sustainable, but the profession is not quite ready to deliver on this promise without further education.” I agree!

Accountants have a long history of providing information to decision makers. They have been in the business of providing information since the 15th century. Really! If you want to read a great book, I recommend The Reckoning: Financial Accountability and the Rise and Fall of Nations by Jacob Soll.  Accountants are big players in the fortunes of companies and nations. With their experience in providing information for decision-making, accountants can provide important sustainability information to companies, governments, and the public.

Sustainability reporting is unfortunately not currently recognized as an important topic in accounting education in the United States. In a curriculum crowded with courses in tax, auditing, financial accounting, and management accounting, training in sustainability reporting is viewed as nice but not necessary.

Why is this?

There are several reasons.

  1. It is not covered on the major certification exams such as the Certified Public Accountants (CPA) exam and the Certified Management Accountant exam.
  2. There is no demand for sustainability reporting skills in accounting public practice because there is no legal requirement to do it in the United States.
  3. Inside companies, accountants are not usually tasked with sustainability accounting and reporting.
  4. Accountants in small to medium sized public practices do not traditionally offer sustainability services.
  5. Most small to medium sized accounting firms do not know how to make the business case for sustainability reporting for their own firm or for their clients.

Over the years there have been attempts to include sustainability reporting as part of accountants’ education but with little progress. Other traditional accounting topics take precedence. Without the demand, change will be slow.

Once in practice, however, accountants who desire to learn about sustainability reporting can look to several professional organizations. The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants promotes the benefits of sustainability services and provides information to its members. The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) offers information and resources. IFAC is actively engaged with  the Prince of Wales’ Accounting for Sustainability Project, the International Integrated Reporting Council, the Climate Disclosure Standards Board, and the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Accountants can attend GRI certified sustainability reporting training courses offered by GRI Training Partners such as the ISOS Group.

How will demand for sustainability reporting be created? Here are some possibilities.

Mandatory reporting – Nothings creates a demand for services like a legal requirement. Examples abound – auditing, tax, Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance.

Demand by financial institutions – As part of the evaluation of companies, lending institutions could require a sustainability report. This report would enable banks to do an expanded risk assessment. This would include a company’s environmental and social risks, which are directly tied to their economic risks.

Demand by local governments – Local governments might consider requiring sustainability reports from companies within the city limits. This would be beneficial to cities in assessing a company’s economic, environmental, and social risks. By complying, organizations would be demonstrating their good citizenship and assessing their own risks.

What do you think?

 

 

 

 

 

GRI G4 Exam
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Sustainability, Sustainability Reporting

GRI G4 EXAM – Worth the time and effort

GRI G4 Exam
GRI G4 Exam

I have been away for a few weeks enjoying the holiday break and studying for the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 Exam. I passed!


For the past two years I have been a trainer in the GRI Certified Training Program with the ISOS Group. You would expect that trainers know the guidelines well!

Is taking the exam worthwhile for others in the sustainability reporting field? Yes! Passing the exam demonstrates your knowledge of the GRI G4 Guidelines. Your employer and clients will have external validation that you are knowledgeable.

In order to be eligible to take the exam, you must complete the GRI G4 Certified Training Course. During this course, you spend two days learning about the guidelines and reporting process. After completing the requirements of the course, you will receive a certificate of attendance.

How much did you retain? When you pass the exam, you demonstrate that you met the GRI’s standard of knowledge. If your employer has paid for you to take the course, why not take the exam to show that their money was well spent. You did more than just attend.

How will others know that you passed the exam? You can put it on your resume. Even better and more public, your name will be on the GRI website on the successful candidates page.

The exam is not free so I recommend that you study. I did, and it was worth my time.

If you decide to take the exam, good luck!

 

 

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Sustainability, Sustainability Reporting, Uncategorized

GRI Reporting for Cities

Chicago as night falls
Chicago as night falls
Photo by Michael White

Cities are getting a lot of attention for taking action on climate change. With cities having over 50 percent of the planet’s population and creating 75 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, this action is born out of necessity.

By 2050, cities will be even larger; it is estimated that they will have 70 percent of the planet’s population. With this expectation, cities are compelled to respond to increases in waste, housing demand, poverty, effluents, water demand, traffic congestion, and air pollution, just to name a few challenges. One of the ways they are responding is by sharing lessons learned with other cities. As a vehicle to share their stories, numerous cities are joining networks such as C40, ICLEI, and ANSI Network on Smart and Sustainable Cities.

In addition to joining networks, cities are preparing sustainability plans and progress reports. The plans typically state goals and targets for carbon emissions, economic initiatives, and waste management. These plans are assessed over time using periodic progress reports comparing actual results to targets. In most instances, cities use whatever reporting format they want. These reports are good for presenting what is working and what is not. Yet are unstandardized formats optimal for better management, transparency, and communication? 

I think cities  would be better served if they used the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Sustainability Reporting GuidelinesThe GRI guidelines are used by 83% of the 250 largest corporations. So what does this have to do with cities? As the most widely used framework, it is known by many investors, governments, and NGOs. This means more people would be able to understand the cities’ GRI reports.

At a recent World Bank Group Webinar, I presented how the GRI Sustainability Reporting Guidelines can benefit cities. What are the benefits? The GRI G4 guidelines focus on an organization’s economic, environmental, and social dimensions. All three are necessary to measure a city’s progress toward sustainable development. The GRI G4 guidelines enable a city to report only what is important to that city. Cities have many challenges in common, but not all challenges are equal across them. In some cities, social issues such as human rights are more pressing whereas in others environmental issues such as air quality need immediate attention. By using a well-known, standardized framework, cities and stakeholders can monitor their progress from period to period. Does using the GRI framework allow for direct comparisons across cities? I do not think any two cities are directly comparable but using a standardized framework would make it easier to share the lessons that have been learned.

Another benefit is that GRI sustainability reporting metrics provide input for an integrated report. Integrated reporting shows how organizations create value in the short, medium, and long terms. This is especially relevant for cities as they plan for the future. An integrated report is intended to connect an organization’s environmental, social, and economic concerns.  For example, if a city invests in electric buses powered with cheaper renewable energy, this investment creates value for the city in many ways. The city’s assets have increased because it purchased the buses. It now has a fleet of electric buses that will create value for the city by reducing yearly fuel and maintenance costs. Using electric buses powered by renewable energy reduces pollutants and carbon emissions which in turn improves air quality. With better air quality, the city improves the health of its citizens. As a result, health care costs are reduced. As shown by the electric bus example, an integrated report can explain how sustainability metrics are connected to creating value.

Cities need to prepare GRI reports as they plan for a sustainable future. Take a look at some pioneering cities that have adopted the GRI framework. The list includes Chicago, Atlanta, Melbourne, Dublin, and Warsaw.

Circular Economy, Sustainability

Circular Economy – Activities in the Midwest

Flyer DIF2015_Open Mic

Decline of the midwestern United State’s industrial sector, sometimes called the “rustbelt,” began in the 1970s as manufacturing outsourcing became more common leading to job and population loss and urban decay. Yet in recent years, much has changed in the region with many activities that can be included in the circular economy.

As part of the Ellen MacArthur Foundation Disruptive Innovation Festival (DIF) 2015, we spoke with nine panelists from Indiana and Kentucky to talk about how their organizations are moving beyond rust belt industries to foster economic, natural, and social resources. Our group was diverse, representing a broad spectrum of organizations and professions. It is reflective of the diversity of the Midwest and the need for connections between diverse partners in a circular economy network. These panelists were a small representation of the activities occurring in the region. In the following sections, I provide a brief description of their conversation. You can click here to watch the Nothing Abandoned: No Place for Rust Belts in the Circular Economy panel discussion along with a followup session.

If you are interested in learning more about a specific panelist’s organization, you can click on their organization name to access their websites linked below.

Imhotep and Diop Adisa, Kheprw Institute (KI), addressed the importance of attending to social capital as an essential element of the circular economy. They discussed the work that KI does as a community empowerment center and independent private school in downtown Indianapolis, Indiana. Their work involves building a culture that is in harmony with the environment and creating economic opportunity through social entrepreneurship. They focus on training and empowering young people through projects that are attractive to them, like social media or aquaponics, and that they can share with other young people and their community.

Duncan Campbell, an architect and historic preservationist, discussed that reusing buildings is far more efficient in many ways than demolishing them. Constructing buildings incurs an environmental debt because materials, fossil fuels, and labor are expended in building structures. If buildings are demolished, the environmental debt is not recovered. The new structures will incur more environmental debt resulting in great waste. Reclaiming structures and repurposing them has shown to reduce economic and environmental waste not to mention the added social benefits of revitalizing commercial areas and neighborhoods.

John Gibson, State Coordinator of Earth Charter Indiana (ECI), provided information about ECI as it pertains to the Circular Economy. ECI launched its first major project in 2006—Sustainable Indiana (SI) 2016. The mission of SI 2016 is to discover, document and celebrate Hoosier­based sustainability initiatives as a Bicentennial legacy. On its website, ECI has a list of sustainability projects across the state in a variety of categories from agriculture, architecture, arts, business, to universities. These stories are explained in detail on the ECI website.

Tayler Glover, Vice President of Indiana Hemp Industries Association, talked about her organization’s work in Indiana as it relates to the Circular Economy. Their mission is to promote the research and development of industrial hemp products and foster industry development within the state of Indiana. Tayler talked about Purdue University’s research with growing industrial hemp. She works to promote the growing of industrial hemp in the US because of its many sustainable properties. The US is largest importer of industrial hemp.

Kelly Kepner, Director of Economic Development for Benton County, Indiana, talked about the benefits from wind farms within the county. The county has three wind farms, the Benton County Wind Farm, the Fowler Ridge Wind Farm and the Hoosier Wind Farm – numbering a total of 495 wind turbines within the county – operated by energy companies Orion Energy Group, BP Alternative Energy and enXco, respectively. Since 2009, the county has collected close to $5 million in combined property taxes from the three wind farms. The tax revenues from these farms enabled the county to pay off all debt, remodel its community center along with purchasing emergency extraction equipment for its various county fire departments.

Sean Vandevander, CEO, and Elisa Owen, Vice President of Ecobridge Industries, talked about their company’s mission to work with local farmers in sustainably growing and harvesting crops that can be processed into bio­composites, bio­plastics, and other Eco­friendly products. They described how they partner with farmers and manufacturers from the Louisville, KY, area which is within a one day’s drive of 65% of the U.S. population. The benefits of local sourcing are many. One is that manufacturers of plant fibers reduce their carbon footprint and meet their personal sustainability goals. In the automotive and green building applications, their feedstock allows for light weighting of components while maintaining strength and cost­competitiveness. In addition, they discussed how their feedstock has superior retention of mechanical properties during recycling when compared with glass­reinforced thermoplastics.

Kyle Squillace, Impressive Prototypes, discussed his firm that specializes in local preproduction prototypes. The firm has experienced model makers with 20­30 years experience in model making, whose skills are maintained, put to continuous use and transferred to a younger generation, including Kyle’s. Several of their pieces of equipment come from previous manufacturing plants that were de­localized to low­cost countries. In addition, Impressive Prototypes use 3D printing as part of their production to create prototypes quickly for local manufacturers. He discussed how they recycle waste materials from their 3D printers.

Please take look at our discussion to see some of  the interesting circular economy activities in the Midwest.

Sustainability, Sustainability Reporting, Uncategorized

Webinar – Sustainability Reporting for Cities with the World Bank Group

Join us for An Integrated  Reporting Community of Practice Event with the World Bank Group

Please click here to mark your calendars and RSVP

Click here to join the meeting (Webinar login instructions below)

reporting_for_cities

Login Instructions:

Sustainability and Integrated Reporting

Tuesday, November 10, 2015
9:30 am  |  Eastern Standard Time (New York, GMT-05:00)  |  1 hr
Click here to join the meeting
Meeting number: 730 321 007
Meeting password: IRCOP1
Join by phone
1-650-479-3207 Call-in toll number (US/Canada)
Access code: 730 321 007
Global call-in numbers
Add this meeting to your calendar.
Can’t join the meeting? Contact support.World Bank Group